Hey {{first_name}} 👋!

Yesterday wasn’t “just another red day”.

It was a positioning reset.

Let’s walk through it properly.

US stocks fell sharply.

Big tech led the decline:

At the same time:

That combination tells you something important.

This wasn’t panic.

It was reassessment.

For the past year, AI has been treated as inevitable upside.

Investors were happy to assume:

“Spend now. Profits later.”

But markets don’t stay patient forever.

Now the questions are tougher:

That shift — from excitement to scrutiny — is what you saw yesterday.

And it matters.

If equities fall because growth expectations weaken, long-term bonds often rise.

Why?

Because:

The strong demand at the 30-year auction tells you institutional investors were comfortable locking in long-term yields.

That isn’t fear.

That’s capital reallocating.

This is the part most candidates get wrong.

They say:

“Stocks fell, so gold should rise.”

Not always.

When markets drop quickly, investors sometimes sell what they can sell.

Gold is liquid (easy to turn into cash, unlike real estate).

If you need to reduce risk across your portfolio, you might sell winners or liquid assets to raise cash.

That’s called liquidation pressure.

Silver dropping 11% tells you this wasn’t just macro nerves.

It was positioning being unwound.

We’re moving from:

Narrative-driven markets → earnings-driven markets.

When money was cheap, stories were enough.

When money is expensive and uncertainty rises, investors demand clarity.

That shift changes how:

Now let’s make this useful for interviews.

The goal is not to list numbers.

The goal is to explain cause and effect.

Instead of saying:

“Tech fell because of AI concerns.”

Say:

“Markets are reassessing whether AI investment will translate into sustainable earnings growth. That reassessment led to multiple compression in tech, while long-duration Treasuries benefited from lower growth expectations.”

That’s calm.
That’s clear.
That’s commercial.

Now let’s go division by division.

What matters here?

Valuations and deal timing.

If tech multiples compress:

In an IBD interview, you could say:

“If tech earnings expectations soften, it may narrow the IPO window and force private companies to adjust valuation expectations. That affects ECM pipelines and advisory activity.”

Here’s the basic English version:

If investors think tech companies won’t make as much money as expected, their share prices fall.

When share prices fall:

That means fewer deals happen.

And if fewer IPOs and deals happen, investment banks earn less in fees.

That’s what it means.

That shows you understand revenue drivers for banks.

Here, it’s about portfolio balance.

This environment rewards:

It punishes:

In an AM interview, you might say:

“In this environment, I’d focus on businesses with pricing power and balance sheet strength. If growth expectations moderate, duration-sensitive assets and quality defensives may outperform.”

Now in basic English:

In this type of market, I’d prefer companies that:

If the economy slows down, flashy high-growth companies usually struggle.

But stable companies — the boring, consistent ones — often hold up better.

And assets that benefit when interest rates fall (like long-term bonds or certain growth stocks) might also do well.

That shows you think about portfolios, not just stocks.

Here it’s about flows and positioning.

Questions traders ask:

You don’t need jargon.

Just say:

“The rally in long-dated Treasuries suggests investors were repositioning ahead of inflation data. The sell-off in tech looks more like de-risking than structural panic.”

Now in basic English:

Investors bought long-term government bonds because they’re being cautious before new inflation numbers are released.

They’re adjusting their portfolios just in case the data moves markets.

The drop in tech stocks doesn’t look like people think the industry is collapsing.

It looks more like investors reducing risk temporarily.

That’s measured.
That’s trader mindset.

Markets don’t move randomly.

They move when expectations shift.

If you can explain:

You will sound significantly stronger than most candidates.

Because most people describe events.

Very few explain them.

In this day and age, with the rise of AI, information is everywhere.

It’s no longer an unfair advantage for you.

And in finance interviews, explanation > information.

Have a good weekend!

Afzal
Finance Guides (£3.33 each)
'Breaking Into Banking' (my debut book)
Finance Fast Track (direct access to me daily) ← Enjoy 6 months free with the annual plan!