Brought to you by Finance Fast Track.
Explore the YouTube channel.
Hey {{first_name}} 👋!
Eight stories this week instead of our usual three.
And what a week it's been.
The CEO of the world's most valuable AI chipmaker has resigned. The Federal Reserve is considering a bigger interest-rate hike. A £5.7 billion airline takeover has cleared a major hurdle. And a private equity giant has committed billions to building wind farms off the British coast.
Here's what we're covering:
Nvidia's CEO resigns: What happens when a $4 trillion company loses its founder?
US inflation surprises: Could the Fed raise rates by 0.5% in December?
Apollo's easyJet takeover: Why private equity wants to buy a budget airline.
UK GDP grows 0.7%: Why good economic news can be bad for borrowers.
OpenAI reaches $10 billion in quarterly revenue: So why is it still losing billions?
A $26 billion buyout falls apart: Why private equity is struggling to finance mega-deals.
America borrows $404 billion in one month: Who actually lends the US government money?
KKR's £12 billion wind farm investment: How infrastructure projects are financed.
For each story, we'll cover what happened, why it matters, and how to discuss it in an interview.
Let's get into it.
I have a handful of spots available for 1:1 coaching (24/7 access to me via Slack, weekly calls, unlimited mock interviews, offer guarantees, and more). Previous mentees have gone on to secure roles at J.P. Morgan, Millennium, GS, PwC, and others. If you’re interested, email your CV to [email protected] and I’ll get back to you.
1. Nvidia's CEO Resigns. What Happens When a $4 Trillion Company Loses Its Founder?
Jensen Huang, the co-founder and CEO of Nvidia, resigned on Thursday following a controversy that has raised questions about corporate governance and national security.
Nvidia appointed its CFO, Colette Kress, as interim CEO while searching for a permanent replacement.
The company's shares fell more than 4% on Thursday, wiping over $180 billion from its market value that day.
But here's what's interesting.
Nvidia hasn't suddenly lost its technology, customers or intellectual property.
So why should losing one executive cause such an enormous reaction?
Because investors don't just value a company's current profits.
They also value their confidence in its future.
Huang spent more than three decades building Nvidia and became closely associated with its strategy, culture and relationships across the AI industry.
Investors now have to reassess how effectively the company can execute that strategy without him.
This is called key-person risk.
And it becomes particularly important when a company's valuation depends on exceptional future growth.
There's also a governance dimension. Nvidia's board has initiated an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the controversy, including reported national-security concerns.
The key question for investors isn't simply who becomes CEO.
It's whether the company can maintain customer confidence, execute its product roadmap and manage regulatory scrutiny.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: For Asset Management and Equity Research, this is about whether leadership uncertainty changes Nvidia's expected earnings or the valuation multiple investors are willing to pay. For Sales & Trading, the uncertainty can increase volatility and demand for hedging.
Clients: Institutional investors with significant Nvidia exposure may need to reassess concentration and governance risks.
Your opinion: "I think Nvidia's long-term competitive advantages are bigger than any individual executive, but the leadership transition introduces uncertainty. I'd be watching whether customers, product development and financial performance remain unaffected."
Outlook: Nvidia's upcoming earnings, succession announcement and any regulatory developments will be particularly important.
2. US Inflation Surprises Markets. Could the Fed Raise Rates by 0.5%?
On Tuesday, the US released its latest inflation figures.
Consumer prices increased 0.4% in October, while core inflation, which excludes food and energy, increased 0.3%.
Both were above economists' expectations.
And core inflation has now increased 0.3% for three consecutive months.
That matters because the Federal Reserve wants inflation to return sustainably towards 2%.
But the interesting part wasn't simply the inflation data.
It was what happened to expectations for interest rates.
Fed Governor Christopher Waller indicated that a 50-basis-point increase in December could be considered if inflation remained persistent.
Investors responded by pushing Treasury yields higher.
Here's the mechanism.
When inflation is higher than expected, investors anticipate that the central bank may need to keep interest rates higher.
That makes existing bonds with lower yields less attractive.
Their prices fall.
And because bond prices and yields move in opposite directions, yields rise.
Higher Treasury yields can then increase borrowing costs throughout the economy.
Companies pay more to issue debt.
Mortgages become more expensive.
Leveraged buyouts become harder to finance.
And the present value of future corporate cash flows can decline.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: Investment Banking teams may face slower debt-financed dealmaking. Fixed Income desks experience changes in bond prices and client hedging demand. Asset managers reassess duration and portfolio allocation.
Clients: Corporate borrowers face higher financing costs, while investors purchasing newly issued bonds may benefit from higher yields.
Your opinion: "I think the Fed needs to prevent inflation from becoming entrenched, but a 50-basis-point hike could be unnecessarily aggressive if higher borrowing costs are already slowing demand."
Outlook: Watch November inflation, employment data and the Fed's December 8–9 meeting.
3. Apollo's £5.7 Billion easyJet Takeover Clears a Major Hurdle
Private equity giant Apollo is moving closer to acquiring easyJet.
On Wednesday, easyJet shareholders approved the proposed takeover, with approximately 97% of shares voted at the court meeting supporting the transaction.
But the deal isn't completed yet.
It still requires court sanction and regulatory approvals.
Why would a private equity firm want to acquire a budget airline?
After all, airlines are notoriously difficult businesses.
Fuel costs fluctuate.
Aircraft are expensive.
Competition is intense.
And economic downturns can significantly reduce travel demand.
The answer comes down to potential value creation.
Private equity firms typically look for businesses they believe they can improve, grow or eventually sell at a higher valuation.
In easyJet's case, Apollo has identified opportunities involving fleet modernisation, ancillary revenue, loyalty programmes and the expansion of easyJet Holidays.
Imagine an airline generates £500 million in annual operating profit.
If its owners can improve operations and increase that figure to £750 million, the business could become substantially more valuable.
But there's a catch.
Private equity acquisitions often involve significant debt.
And higher interest rates make that debt more expensive.
The challenge is generating enough additional value to justify both the acquisition price and the financing costs.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: M&A bankers advise on valuations and transaction structure. Leveraged Finance teams arrange acquisition debt. Private equity investors model operating improvements and exit returns.
Clients: Shareholders receive an opportunity to sell at the agreed price, while lenders assess the airline's ability to service acquisition financing.
Your opinion: "I can see the appeal of easyJet's established brand and holiday business, but airlines are cyclical and capital-intensive. I'd be particularly focused on the acquisition leverage and how resilient cash flows would be during an economic downturn."
Outlook: Watch regulatory approval, the court process and whether the transaction completes as expected in early 2027.
Enjoy 90% OFF the entire collection of Career Guides by using code SAVE90 at checkout.
Alternatively, check out IB Cheat Codes and AI Prompts to speed up your applications and interview success rate.
4. The UK Economy Grows 0.7%. So Why Might That Be Bad News?
The UK economy expanded 0.7% in the third quarter of 2026, its fastest quarterly growth since early 2024.
That's an improvement from the previous quarter's 0.5% growth.
Services were the main driver, expanding 0.9%, while construction contracted 0.7%.
At first glance, stronger economic growth sounds like excellent news.
More activity.
More spending.
More business investment.
But financial markets don't always celebrate stronger GDP figures.
Because stronger growth can make central banks less willing to reduce interest rates.
Imagine the Bank of England is worried about inflation.
If the economy is weakening rapidly, raising rates could cause unnecessary economic damage.
But if the economy is growing strongly, the Bank may feel it has more room to keep rates elevated or increase them.
That can push gilt yields higher and make financing more expensive.
So you can end up with a situation where the economy is performing better than expected, but bond prices fall.
There's another important detail.
Much of the UK's recent growth has come from services, including technology and business-facing activities.
That raises a question about how widely the benefits of growth are being shared across the economy.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: UK-focused banks may benefit from stronger business activity and loan demand. Asset managers must consider the implications for gilt yields, sterling and equity valuations.
Clients: Corporate borrowers may face higher financing costs, while businesses exposed to stronger consumer or corporate spending may benefit.
Your opinion: "I'm encouraged by stronger UK growth, but I'd want to see it become more broad-based. If growth is concentrated in a handful of sectors while construction remains weak, the headline GDP figure may overstate the strength of the wider economy."
Outlook: Watch inflation, wage growth and the Bank of England's December decision.
5. OpenAI Reaches $10 Billion in Quarterly Revenue. So Why Is It Still Losing Billions?
OpenAI reportedly generated $10 billion in revenue during the third quarter, an increase of approximately 50% from the previous quarter.
That's extraordinary growth.
But according to documents reported by The Wall Street Journal, its operating losses widened to approximately $10.9 billion.
Think about that.
A company generating $10 billion in quarterly revenue is still reporting operating losses larger than its revenue.
How is that possible?
Because revenue isn't profit.
OpenAI generates revenue from subscriptions, API usage and enterprise customers.
But it also faces enormous costs associated with computing infrastructure, research, employees and developing increasingly sophisticated AI models.
And those costs are growing rapidly.
Here's why investors care.
A business can grow revenue by 50% and still become less financially attractive if its costs grow even faster.
Imagine a company generates £100 million in revenue and spends £150 million operating the business.
It loses £50 million.
Next year, revenue doubles to £200 million.
Fantastic, right?
Not necessarily.
If operating costs increase to £320 million, the loss has widened to £120 million.
The business is growing, but its economics haven't improved.
The question is whether growth eventually produces sustainable profits and cash flow.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: Investment Banking and Equity Research teams must distinguish revenue growth from profitability, cash burn and valuation. Private-market investors need to assess future funding requirements.
Clients: Venture capital and institutional investors must determine whether the company's future earnings potential justifies today's valuation.
Your opinion: "I think OpenAI's revenue growth demonstrates genuine demand for AI, but the scale of its losses makes unit economics and future cash generation critical. I'd want to understand whether computing costs decline relative to revenue as the business scales."
Outlook: Watch operating margins, infrastructure spending, competition and any future IPO plans.
6. Two Private Equity Giants Abandon a Potential $26 Billion Takeover
Private equity firms Clayton, Dubilier & Rice and GTCR have abandoned preliminary discussions to acquire payments company Global Payments.
The business was valued at approximately $26.4 billion.
And the main obstacle?
The complexity of financing a transaction of that size.
Here's why higher interest rates make leveraged buyouts more difficult.
Imagine a private equity firm wants to acquire a business for $20 billion.
It plans to contribute $8 billion of equity and borrow $12 billion.
If the debt costs 5% annually, that's $600 million in interest.
If borrowing costs rise to 9%, the annual interest bill increases to $1.08 billion.
That's an additional $480 million every year.
And that extra expense reduces the cash available to repay debt or distribute to investors.
It can also reduce the return the private equity firm expects to earn when it eventually sells the business.
The buyer might respond by offering a lower purchase price.
But the seller may refuse.
And sometimes the deal simply doesn't happen.
That's why the availability and price of debt can determine whether an acquisition is financially viable.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: M&A teams may lose potential advisory mandates when deals collapse. Leveraged Finance teams must assess debt capacity, interest coverage and lender appetite.
Clients: Private equity firms may need to contribute more equity, pursue smaller acquisitions or negotiate lower valuations.
Your opinion: "I think walking away can demonstrate good investment discipline. A transaction that looks attractive at 5% financing costs might destroy value at 9%, particularly if the buyer is relying heavily on leverage to generate returns."
Outlook: Watch credit spreads, lending conditions and whether private equity dealmaking recovers if financing becomes cheaper.
Imagine paying £30 and then securing an internship that’ll pay you £12,000 over the summer; or paying £30 and securing a £60k base salary grad-scheme.
Previous readers of this newsletter who joined Finance Fast Track have done exactly that.
Will you be next? Join today!
7. America Borrowed $404 Billion in a Single Month
The US government recorded a $404 billion budget deficit in October.
That's a record for the month and approximately 42% larger than the deficit recorded in October 2025.
Government spending reached $773 billion.
Revenue was approximately $369 billion.
And interest on federal debt alone reached $115 billion.
That last number is particularly interesting.
The US government spent more than $100 billion servicing its debt in a single month.
So who actually lends the government this money?
Investors do.
When the US government spends more than it collects in taxes, the Treasury finances the difference partly by issuing government securities.
These include Treasury bills, notes and bonds.
They're purchased by banks, pension funds, asset managers, foreign institutions and other investors.
But investors expect compensation.
And the higher the yield investors demand, the more expensive new government borrowing becomes.
This can create a difficult cycle.
Large deficits increase the need to issue debt.
Greater debt issuance can put upward pressure on yields, depending on investor demand and broader economic conditions.
Higher yields then increase the cost of financing new debt and refinancing existing obligations.
That adds further pressure to future budgets.
One important caveat: some government payments were shifted into October because of calendar timing, so the headline monthly deficit shouldn't be treated as a normal monthly run rate.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: Fixed Income and Macro teams analyse Treasury issuance, yields and investor demand. Asset managers consider government debt within portfolio allocation.
Clients: Higher Treasury yields can affect corporate borrowing costs, mortgages and the relative attractiveness of bonds versus equities.
Your opinion: "I'm less concerned about one unusually large monthly deficit than the longer-term trajectory of US borrowing and interest expenses. The key question is whether economic growth and government revenues can keep pace with debt-servicing costs."
Outlook: Watch Treasury auctions, longer-term yields, fiscal policy and annual deficit projections.
8. KKR Commits Billions to UK Offshore Wind. Here's How the Deal Works.
Private equity and infrastructure investor KKR has partnered with energy company RWE on approximately £12 billion of offshore wind investment in the UK.
The Vanguard West and Vanguard East projects will have a combined capacity of 2.8 gigawatts.
That's enough to supply the equivalent of approximately three million UK homes.
But the most interesting part is how they're being financed.
The projects have secured a financing package involving £11.1 billion in cash facilities and £1.7 billion in ancillary facilities, supported by 35 international banks.
It's the largest project financing arranged for UK offshore wind.
So what makes infrastructure financing different from an ordinary corporate loan?
In traditional corporate lending, banks often assess the financial strength and cash flows of the overall borrower.
In project finance, lenders focus heavily on the cash flows and assets of a specific project.
For example, a wind farm costs billions to build today.
But once operational, it can generate electricity and revenue for decades.
If the future cash flows are sufficiently predictable, lenders may be willing to provide long-term financing against the project itself.
In this case, the wind farms have secured 20-year inflation-indexed Contracts for Difference.
These contracts help stabilise revenues by providing a mechanism that adjusts payments relative to an agreed electricity strike price.
That revenue visibility can make large infrastructure projects more financeable.
It's a useful contrast with speculative AI infrastructure investments, where future revenues may be less certain.
Interview talking points
Firm/division: Project Finance teams structure long-term debt. Infrastructure investors assess construction risk, operating cash flows and expected returns. Risk teams analyse counterparties and project viability.
Clients: Institutional investors gain exposure to long-duration infrastructure assets, while energy developers access capital for projects too large to finance entirely from their own balance sheets.
Your opinion: "I think this transaction demonstrates why contracted infrastructure cash flows can attract significant capital even when interest rates are elevated. However, I'd still pay close attention to construction delays, cost overruns and the allocation of risk between sponsors and lenders."
Outlook: Watch construction progress, financing costs and whether the projects meet their expected 2030 commissioning timetable.
Final Thoughts
Eight stories this week.
But they all connect through three fundamental ideas.
1. Expectations determine valuations.
Nvidia's leadership crisis and OpenAI's financial results show why investors care about more than current revenue.
They care about future growth, profitability, management and risk.
2. Interest rates influence almost everything.
Higher inflation affects Federal Reserve decisions.
Those decisions influence borrowing costs.
Borrowing costs affect private equity acquisitions, government debt and corporate investment.
And changes in financing costs can determine whether a transaction happens at all.
3. Capital flows towards opportunities where investors believe the returns justify the risks.
Apollo wants to acquire easyJet because it believes it can create value.
Private equity firms abandoned Global Payments because the financing became too difficult.
KKR and RWE secured billions for offshore wind because the projects offer a structure lenders are prepared to finance.
Different transactions.
Different industries.
But the same underlying question:
Is the expected return worth the risk?
And that's exactly how I want you to approach commercial awareness in interviews.
Don't just memorise what happened.
Understand the financial mechanism.
Connect it to the firm and division you're applying to.
Consider how clients might be affected.
Develop your own opinion.
And think about what happens next.
You don't need to know everything happening in financial markets.
But you should be able to explain the important stories properly.
That's all for now. Have a good week ahead!
Afzal
P.S. Want me to coach you 1-1 to break into banking? Send your CV to [email protected] and I’ll get back to you.